Originally Posted by chrisreedrules

I used to think that AAG would have shut down PSA. I'm actually not so sure anymore. Was PSA a small airline back then? Yes. COULD they have shut PSA down if they really wanted to? Also yes. And they could have done it much easier than they could have to Envoy. However, all that being said, I don't think they would of. I think their plan has always been 2 or 3 regional partners. One flying the CRJ and the other flying the ERJ175. PSA still would of made the most sense even had they voted down the concessions. Our leadership screwed us with that. And they screwed us with our flow agreement. We aren't hiring and so our flow can't reach more than 5 /month if we aren't hiring and upgrading. Meanwhile, Piedmont, an airline half our size is going to step up to flowing 5 /month in a few months. They were played like a fiddle by management and didn't have the best interests of the pilot group in mind. Hopefully our new leadership and essentially what has become an entirely different pilot group rectify some of this.