Originally Posted by
Flytolive
man-made global climate change is as close to scientific certainty as is possible.
LOL
Sure it is, when you use fudged statistics, manipulated data, and hockey sticks bent to show what you want it show in support of your socio-economic political agenda.
"consensus" = we don't want the gov't-funded studies gravy-train to stop, forcing us to get real jobs
And hey, nevermind "scientists" can't accurately predict with certainty what the Wx is going to be in 2 weeks, much less 2 decades or centuries from now.
Who is the more believable...a cautious skeptic pointing at the gaping holes in the theory or the true believer relying on the exact same "scientific consensus" that once held the earth was flat and the universe rotated around it?
We all know the answer to that.
Originally Posted by
FDXLAG
Of course, to disagree would result in a loss of funding.
Originally Posted by
Flytolive
Yep, we should trust Exxon and their paid parrots.
Nice transparent deflection. Pity it does absolutely nothing to address FDXLAG's comment in any way, shape, or form.
That's because you have no counter-argument. You know it's true.
Originally Posted by
Flytolive
Do you still think smoking tobacco doesn't cause cancer?
Science has PROVEN smoking can cause cancer.
Science has NOT proven "global warming".
What part of these very simple sentences don't you understand, child?