Originally Posted by
Crjreg007
I think more of what he is saying is that if you do your research PSA is what you signed up more. Besides the critical pay PSA is what we signed into contract a few years back. We took this pay for growth and got a lot of growth and now we want that growth and more pay. FO pay is bad but we got offered some thing to make it a little better and said no. A lot of places would have killed to have as many quick upgrades as we got. Is the pay here not what we signed in? I know it's unpopular opinion here but some of our pilots want more while the ones we could help suffer. Getting pilots in the door benefits every one even if that means not every one gets more money.
This kind of thinking got you where you are today..."Getting more pilots in the door" accepting below-average pay while keeping money away from pilots on hand only benefits the company..
Edit: trying hard not to be another PSA basher, just calling it how I see it. Of course the company will do things this way, they need pilots and want to save money. I'm just surprised at how many pilots are going along with it and even trying to justify it.