View Single Post
Old 04-13-2016, 07:39 PM
  #15  
EMAW
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 461
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
It boggles the mind that people can be a professional in the industry and still not understand the regulation. It really is dirt simple

Yes: if you're sole manipulator, you may log PIC.

Yes: if you log PIC while not the acting PIC, it may be met with distain or disapproval at both Part 121 and 135 operations, as well as many Part 91 operations.

Yes: your sole manipulator time at the controls of an aircraft for which you are rated may be logged as pilot in command time, and used toward the requirements of a certificate or rating that requires pilot in command time.

Yes: "rated" means category and class (and where appropriate, type). In your case, Airplane category, single engine land class. If you hold this as a category/class rating on your pilot certificate, and you're sole manipulator, you can log it as PIC.

Having said this: if you're not qualified as PIC in the aircraft and are not PIC under Part 135, other employers may view your decision to log PIC in the aircraft as a negative.

A regional may not care; if you're a warm body and meet the minimums, and don't have orange antennas growing out of your head, you'll probably get hired. By the time you've buried your past experience under a logbook or two, nobody will notice or care what you did in the first few hours of your career.

There's no "smoking gun." Read the damn regulation. It's quite clear.
Not only these, but Part 135 passenger carrying ops already REQUIRE an SIC, always. Single engine, multi-engine, Turbine, or piston doesn't matter.
You can receive an ops spec that allows the use of the autopilot in lieu of SIC, but that is the exception, not the rule. It's similar to the question of when do you need to file an alternate. The answer is ALWAYS, except.....
EMAW is offline