Originally Posted by
marcal
If the company offers you 1,000,000/hr in exchange for Pulling OE trips before the bid, you would vote no?
I wouldn't.
While I respect the fact that people have their wants for a new deal, this sort of thinking doesn't sit right with me. The point of my example is that there is a point in which a deal can be made, it just may be more than what the company will sell for which keeps things status quo.
I find the idea of voting no for something no matter what to be dangerous and shortsighted and I feel that our guys are smarter than that.
Keep your emotions out of this, see what the deal is, weigh the pros and cons, make your choice.
But, please people don't make rash yes or no votes if they "touch" certain things.
It's not "rash" to vote no if the company does touch certain things. If they want widebody scope relief....I'm a no vote. That's not rash, because that's our future jobs. Sure...if the company gave us all we could ask for and more in every other area, I may reconsider....but it's not rash to vote no if they take away something that is important to you.