Originally Posted by
marcal
Nothing I saw stood out as anything I couldn't live with*, but the whole package would obviously need to be considered.
*I spent two minutes reading it.
Were you here for the previous TA? You might need a better grasp of the issues. No pre- verification with a rolling 12 month lookback is a massive concession.
Virtual basing as described is basically a blank check. Will cost a lot of jobs.
There are a lot more issues that need to be explained before we know the true scope of these concessions. Speaking of scope, why wasn't it improved?
Please get up to speed and delve into it before mailing in your yes vote.