Old 07-23-2016 | 07:45 AM
  #27  
Einstein2014
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CLT Guy
Actually, PSA's completion factor and D:0 is really, really good. PSA's completion factor for the past 12 months is above 99.4% and until the summer thunderstorm season hit, the D:0 was also above 88%. I have a really hard time believing that AWAC's completion factor is higher than that.

The way that D:0 is calculated, if the flight is delayed due to weather, then it does not count against the D:0. But, if that delay causes a delay in the next flight (either because you were so delayed that you can't make the time up on the turn, or another airplane is delayed because they were waiting for your gate, or there was a DH crew on your airplane that can't get to their airplane, or several other reasons), then all of those other delays ARE counted against us for D:0. So, during the summer, any D:0 above 80% is pretty good considering there are thunderstorms in CLT just about every day.

And, if AWAC's fuel numbers are better than PSA's, then I really feel bad for the guys at AWAC. After seeing all of the nonsense that we put up with at PSA to keep our fuel numbers as low as possible, I would hate to think what you have to do to get them even lower.
There is nothing more I hate than to get into a ****ing match as to which airline is the best. But, it grinds my gears 😂 When people post/paraphrase data without a source. Show us the source that contains that information to date. I am also interested in your opinion as to why you doubt AWAC's performance couldn't possibly be better than your company's.
Reply