Originally Posted by
Herkflyr
Show me the math with real quantifiable examples. .55% isn't it. That said I will concede you may be right.
The .55 would have been higher, up to 3%(the non cons raise) had our rates been lower. The pay increase was to match AAL/UAL. This would have given us our current rates plus we would have kept the PS. This trade is costing us money today.