View Single Post
Old 07-25-2016 | 10:10 AM
  #48  
Jughead135's Avatar
Jughead135
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 2
From: Hates Commuting
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
I still say a one-for-one PS for pay rate trade is a good deal. More importantly, the math says so.
Timbo's most excellent breakdown shows why this isn't so--it needs to be better than 1:1 to be a "straight" trade.

That said, a more important reason IMO not to trade PS for pay rates: even if you make the math "work" for the trade, it's only good for one contract cycle--after which the company will have developed amnesia regarding the basis of the pay rates and will insist on comparing only pay rates to other carriers'. That's what folks here are talking about re PS not being "costed" by the NMB; and that's why we've been "losing money" since the amendable date. We're already subject to both of those issues--i.e., have you heard any talk of pay rates going to "UPS + 1 + <what was converted from PS>"? No, because it's gone. Forever.

Let's not repeat that mistake! NO to PS trades!
Reply