Sorry, junior. It's not on me to prove your "experts" are lying, it's on
you to prove your "experts" are telling the truth and NOT cooking the books as a direct result of the inherent conflict of interest between publicly funded research and what that research purports to show. And so far you are batting a big, fat "0", kiddo.
Originally Posted by
Flytolive
Your weak attempts to refute peer-reviewed scientific data with tripe from fringe sites without experts are baseless
O'rly?
LOL
Meanwhile, your "experts" are stuck.....once again!...in sea ice that they claimed wasn't supposed to be there.
Ooopsie!
Polar Voyage Meant To Prove Global Warming STUCK In Ice | The Daily Caller
Ho hum. So much for your "peer reviewed data".
Lemme say it again since you don't seem to understand plain english...
Originally Posted by
SayAlt
Show us all why there is no conflict of interest between global warming data and publicly funded research...
...prove the data has NOT been cooked...
...demonstrate that the debate hasn't been rigged by the very people who just got caught rigging their own primary process...
LOL
Hint: you can't.
All you can do is desperately try to change the subject. And everybody knows it.
Heck, you won't even address how/why the warmulist lobby is now attempting to silence debate using the courts!
And yet you claim you can win debates?
LMAO
