LOL
You are right about one thing. I can get emotional when people...like hypocritical climate fear-mongers...are very clearly and intentionally lying to the public, avoid/deflect from/ignore direct questions, steal taxpayer funds to promote ideologically-driven agendas, and love to pretend they have morals and are better than other people when in fact they have been proven to have none whatsoever and rank among the lowest filth on the planet.
I also tend to get angry with lying hypocrites who lay claim to not having engaged in emotional argument....like calling skeptics "deniers" and saying things like "you couldn't win an 8th grade debate" (clearly intended as an emotional-based insult)....then subsequently pretend they haven't engaged in such behavior, as you just did. Even worse is when they seek to subvert the criminal justice system to prosecute and penalize anyone who dares to disagree with them and their unproven theory AFTER having engaged in such behavior.
I am confident it is very clear to anyone who has taken the time to read through this thread, and our exchanges in it, who is being reasonably skeptical in this age of proven big gov't deception and collusion vs. who is being dishonest and evasive. After all, us skeptics aren't trying to subvert the law and prosecute anyone for having a scientific theory, unlike the alarmist fear-mongers who now seek to criminalize anyone who promotes skepticism of their unproven theory.
Calling you a useful idiot, sir, isn't an insult per se, it is merely an observation of fact. Now run along and drink your kool-aid.