Thread: AMRG
View Single Post
Old 08-28-2016, 10:39 PM
  #30  
JohnBurke
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
Default

Originally Posted by 155mm View Post
Certainly won't lose a wink of sleep over it! It's a different company! You are confusing the facts with the organization of today with the one of 30 years ago that I flew for when this new CEO was in diapers. Go ahead and discourage people from going there...I don't give a rats a$$!
It's the same company. The legal paper you cited merely said that they're different corporate entities. It's a shell game, different names, but the same players. Same people, same owners, same principles. The same people that lie, cheat, and steal in one company do it in the others. As you managed to try to avoid pointing out, but did with your link, they were denied accreditation for falsifying reports, withholding information, lying, misrepresenting, and failing to meet criteria for CAMTS, the most basic certification for any air ambulance operation. They were barred from their bread and butter operation, BIA contracts, and have resorted to buying up numerous certificates and names to expand and hide their names. They opened up a new office in the same state, but still run by the same people.

Again, a leopard does not change its spots.

Joe may have been in diapers when you worked for his daddy, who did everything then that Joe does now. He learned from his father, grew up with the company, and has been pulling the same stuff for many years.

YOU introduced the link and the paper, quoted above, which includes numerous references to incidents during a particular period of time, but those are just a sliver of the total number of incidents with which the various company faces and names are associated. It's absolutely a shell game, an attempt to bolster credibility from an organization that has had numerous medical personnel call them on the carpet, and an attempt to hide the past.

You've lied here about the company, and outright lied about the statements made in this thread. You've tried to call statements by eyewitnesses "hearsay," and have even tried to twist the definition of the word. Any semblance of credibility you might have hoped to hold up has been shot, and any further effort addressing your comments would be a waste. It's for those reasons and more that you'll go on the ignore list. I won't waste further time on you.

Originally Posted by 155mm View Post
This message is hidden because 155mm is on your ignore list.
The signal to noise ration has improved a thousand fold already.
JohnBurke is offline