I'm not against the idea of a production balance. In fact, that's great. I just think we need to diversify how its measured.

We need protections in ESKs and BHs, as well as per theatre and per individual agreement. Simply going to a global BH balance could theoretically work, but only if what we got was an all scenario slam dunk gain. I don't see that in any case. IMO the only reason the company wants this is for massively increased flexibility, and the only reason they want that is to reduce DL pilots and DL metal in the aggregate long term all things considered.

I could maybe vote for that if our "share" was eye wateringly amazing, but we all know its not going to be.