Originally Posted by
Sink r8
That's how much separates the weak, sissified yes in C2012 (62-38), from the glorious, "super majority" no of TA1 (65-35).
A lot of us talk about "the majority" on APC and elsewhere. How do we know? We only know about the LAST vote. 3% isn't a license to speak for the group, now and forever. It's not a reflection of the present, but the past.
I think this group is fully qualified to speak for itself.
LOLWUT?
62% yes to 65% no is a LOT more than 3%, not sure what you're alluding to.
The Surrender Seven are clearly advocating for a vote of POSTA2.0 which is a repackaging of POSTA1.0 with a few "deck chairs rearranged". The big variable to them is they think the membership is so desperate for any TA they will cave and MEMRAT whatever's brought to them.
I'm fine with having a vote again on a poison pill laced agreement. One last time, and then we get serious. Will the 7 agree to that though, or will they demand another vote on a substandard TA until voter fatigue/apathy nets them something, anything?