View Single Post
Old 10-18-2016, 06:32 AM
  #35  
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,292
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
That's not what the legal opinion states. It references a flight, a theoretical posited by the submitter, in which the safety pilot has acted as safety pilot for only a portion of the flight. A flight with multiple legs in which the safety pilot acts in that capacity for the duration of the legs, including approaches and landings (it's done; zero zero simulated takeoffs and landings with safety pilot or instructor), the legal interpretation does not prohibit logging of cross country for a safety pilot.

The rationale in the interpretation isn't about making a takeoff or landing, it's about acting as a required crew member for the duration of a flight. On a multiple-leg flight with each leg more than 50 nm from the point of origin, cross country time may be loggable for each segment. If the safety pilot is a required crew member for one or two segments, but not all, those segments for which the safety pilot remains a required crew member for the entire segment (not just a part) may be logged as cross country. Nothing in the legal interpretation prohibits this, but in fact, the interpretation supports it.

Note the relevant language: "However, Pilot B may not log any cross-country flight time because that pilot was a required flight crewmember for only a portion of the flight."
I know that, and that's a convoluted way of saying what I said in the first place. The net effect for most folks is that you cannot log XC on a flight where you served as SP pilot because you were not a required crewmember for the duration of the flight. Most of GA pilots can't do zero/zero LDGs and while zero/zero takeoffs may be technically legal in GA, it's not a very good idea at all.
rickair7777 is offline