Originally Posted by
cr700
Moon is correct. The flow is contractual. If Envoy flowed a single person less than what is outlined in the contract, they would be in violation of said contract.
No, the 824 was an arbitration ruling as a result of our original flow agreement, Letter 3, being violated. So much for contractual flow not being violated, right? Then, the protected pilot flow was a result of an arbitration settlement from our aircraft being transferred off of our certificate. The only "contractual" flow starts after the PP group.
That said, this isn't even an issue. There won't be any issues with honoring the contract and flowing at the very least, the minimum numbers stated there.
The company is literally violating the contract every day, and you tell us to trust you that they won't violate the flow when it suits them? That's just laughable. After the 824 is completed, all bets are off folks.