Originally Posted by
757Driver
I completely agree. The 3 party negotiations netted us a sub-standard agreement but it was preventable with a no vote. Not trying to beat a dead horse but we could have started the merger with the best language and highest pay rates out there and we clearly did not.
One for the history books as a lost opportunity.
A NO vote would have just lead to further 3 party negotiation. No point belaboring the topic. It's done. On to the next negotiation.