Originally Posted by
Macjet
On this he is right. Our negotiators set our ask at what should be our strike point. They should have bumped 3-5% and that would have stayed within the zone of reasonableness. The negotiated rate will unfortunately be well below this. The question is, will we vote it down or in?
I am thinking their strategy revolves more around presenting a case to the mediator of reasonableness to move things along that process quicker.
I wonder what coming in north of UAL et al would look like in the eyes of the mediator vs calculating average and asking for that