Originally Posted by
Lemons
Yes but at the time of the accident he had well above that. So I don't understand the logic. Either way he would have been in the same position rule or no rule.
It's not logic, it is union talking points which some people parrot ad nauseam. The 1500 hour rule has nothing to do with safety, it was a gift to the unions by Obama.
The rest requirement change and the emphasis about stall/spin awareness were justified and are about safety.