Originally Posted by
lancaster
Dunno, but if the peeps doing the negotiations had CJOs then it would not be in their interest to poke the bear. I personally think the pay negotiations are a red herring, to deflect from real issues that are uncomfortable.
Maybe people with cjo's shouldn't be in the negotiations. I know a couple of them that are great guys who want good things for us, but you've got a point. Maybe they subconsciously are less aggressive than that would be otherwise
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk