Originally Posted by
Pedro4President
Three thing:
1- The company negotiated in bad faith when they said we could flow 50% of AA new hire class but never intended to honor it.
2- I think most people have some type of Stockholm syndrome or they are just numb to the fact that the company doesn't honor the contract.
3. No uproar will take place by the pilot group until they company breaks the 25 per month minimum. And even then I'm not sure the level of backlash will be very strong if the contract violation isn't perceived to be very egregious.
But in all fairness your post are usually over stating the negatives or you are just making stuff up. No one likes you here and you have no credibility because you aren't objective or honest.
Yeah it seems bad faith negotiations to me. Prior to #40 they could always say we'll it was arbitrated that way, now that we have them it's all based off what we negotiated and publicly stating never more than 25 throws out their "staffing needs" vs bad faith argument.
But like all things with Envoy it will come down to what an arbitrator will rule. I just hope they've weakened their case.