Originally Posted by
Excargodog
Seriously? I'm not sure he could even legally be PIC of what he flew without an ATP:
§ 91.1053 Crewmember experience.
(a) No program manager or owner may use any person, nor may any person serve, as a pilot in command or second in command of a program aircraft, or as a flight attendant on a program aircraft, in program operations under this subpart unless that person has met the applicable requirements of part 61 of this chapter and has the following experience and ratings:
(1) Total flight time for all pilots:
(i) Pilot in command - A minimum of 1,500 hours.
(ii) Second in command - A minimum of 500 hours.
(2) For multi-engine turbine-powered fixed-wing and powered-lift aircraft, the following FAA certification and ratings requirements:
(i) Pilot in command - Airline transport pilot and applicable type ratings.
(ii) Second in command - Commercial pilot and instrument ratings.
.....
Or did you mean to say you had an ATP that dated from before the CTP requirement?
He's typed, Why couldn't he be PIC?
Never ceases to amaze me how little so many 121 guys know about stuff outside 121 (or even inside it).
Flying part 91 <19 seats, just PPL, multi and type rating..
91K - not sure, assume like 135
135 - 10> seats -1200 hours, typed. If it's >10seats
OR turbojet - Needs ATP to be PIC.
Qualifying as 121 time - 135 greater than 10 seats
or turbojet - why, ATP is required, just like 121.
If he has this much turbine PIC, he might want to look at doing his ATP on his own then going for F9/NK.