View Single Post
Old 11-07-2007 | 10:27 PM
  #134  
dontsurf's Avatar
dontsurf
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 4
From: A220 CA
Default

Originally Posted by bla bla bla
And next time you write a contract you might want to include a provision for alter-ego airlines. I feel your pain with tsa, but I’m sure no one thought management would stoop to that level. Live and learn. The solution is not discontinuing contracts, but writing better ones.....
seriously, you should at least look this up or ask someone who was at tsa when the whole gojets thing went down. or heck, read the contract! it's all right there in black and white. that's why i pointed out the fact that they willfully and blatantly violated the contract in creating gojets the way they did. and my point still stands...the contract did nothing whatsoever to make things right. "legally enforceable" is meaningless unless management wants to do the right thing, at least in the current political climate. someone else on here said it's all up to management, what sort of relationship or managerial philosophy they have when dealing with labor. if they have a good concept, then relations will be good, union or no union. if they have a bad concept (e.g. trans states), relations will be bad, union or no union. and obviously, if they're that bad, you better hope you have a union or it would be even worse. but the union can't keep it from being pretty darn bad (again, ask anyone who worked at trans states when that happened).
Reply