Originally Posted by
jtsastre
You seem to always jump to respond to these sort of replies to defend your “union.” Why?
Aren’t companies allowed to exist today without unionization? The majority of the technology sector is without union, yet they’re not considered, as you say, “all so cute.” Why? What makes aviation different from technology?
I realize the transportation sector has historically followed union laws because of the railroad, but why? Because, they’ve needed to make laws to protect their jobs? That was a positive reaction to a negative purpose. But what about today? The cause doesn’t seem so justified.
Explain “doesn’t seem so justified.” Quite often things look very different when looking from the outside in verses being entangled in it on the inside. And I hate to bring this up again, but do you really believe that we’d have what we have today in this industry without a national union? Sure Skywest made a good company without a union, but Skywest isn’t the same company today. Sometimes you need to change with the times and get rid of the, that’s the way we’ve always done it thinking