Originally Posted by
av8or
Preciate the break down on the % line Mea. And, if I read it right, none of that takes into account attrition between now and 24-25.
I can understand why people get sideways with naysayers and koolaide drinkers alike, but I’ll never understand why they get sideways with someone who just has some actual intel, not gospel truth, but at least snapshot level intel, trying to help guys make decisions for THEIR future.
Uhm... The retirements are built in to those numbers. The back end attrition is rarely anywhere near the upgrade line, usually falling off the very bottom realistically affecting no one. Early on there may be a slight increase of east cost FO departures closer to that line but this will be a very small number.
Alaska upgrade time for anyone hired 2016 to current should be 7 - 11.5 years. I know that isn’t sexy. Those are just the facts.