Originally Posted by
Flytolive
Yes, FRMS/duty extension that was preserved by a previous and unanimous MEC 'No' vote on the topic. Munoz needed to change the narrative especially since the FA contract negotiation was dragging on and on.
So fun to pretend that there is nothing that the company wants or that we need to protect in our contract. You might want to compare DAL & UAL wide body fleets.
So 787s were arriving on the property, Oscar needed relief on the ULH routes and he wanted to change the narrative? That's a bargain if I ever saw one.
I'm too old to pretend. The only way to achieve true contractual gains is to actually negotiate a contract. The JCBA doesn't count due to competing interests. I've been waiting 16 years.
You raise the spectre of the company Christmas wish list, protecting our contract, and our lopsided widebody advantage over Delta. What has changed in the landscape from the days of the extension to the present that allows us to open the entire contract now vs 3-4 years ago?