Originally Posted by
DashTrash
But are we willing to pay for reserve language that will most likely be marginally better for giving away our scope??? As I’ve said before many times. I will personally vote no on any TA that contains ANY relaxation in scope. I won’t even read past Section One. Automatic no!!!
Why in the world would you think we have to give anything up? I finished giving in the bankruptcy contract. Certainly not scope.
With minimal changes to the reserve section, we can get huge improvements to QOL, with little cost to the company. Just stop the intentional abuse that really doesn't net the company anything except some limited improvement in their flexibility. A little planning on their part would avoid the need entirely. But that would necessitate actually doing their job instead of short cuts to staffing.