Originally Posted by
Andy
That's because you and I have disagreements on some of what you consider problematic areas of the current contract with respect to reserve rules. I've responded with my point of view on those items. I'll accept the snarky label but will disagree once again with you on the inaccuracy of my rebuttals.
As for snarkiness, how do you classify your oft-used phrase 'marvin mainliner'?
There were more than just reserve rules.
Marvin is not my phrase, just one I learned about in 1999. If the shoe fits then I'll use it.