Search

Notices

PP%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2019 | 10:15 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
No thank you. Your previous posts snarky and inaccurate rejoinder persuaded me to skip taking the trouble.

There were numerous threads here and in particular, the union forum which spelled them all out. Guys a whole lot more erudite than me detailed the zits. But, it passed and it's now history. When was that, 7 years ago? And how far are we away from our next contract? And please, let's not forget what was going on at the time which encouraged a whole mess of the pilot group to push for a concessionary JCBA. "We'll get em next time!"

The FNG's might be interested in how we got here, even though many of the older guys are not.

Try a search.
That's because you and I have disagreements on some of what you consider problematic areas of the current contract with respect to reserve rules. I've responded with my point of view on those items. I'll accept the snarky label but will disagree once again with you on the inaccuracy of my rebuttals.

As for snarkiness, how do you classify your oft-used phrase 'marvin mainliner'?
Reply
Old 04-13-2019 | 10:19 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
Doing anything for them, including a nice “retro pay” or signing bonus buys zero good will for mgt, cause they’re soon gone.
Retro pay? Signing bonus? When's the last time any airline contract saw such things? When's the last time a UAL or CAL contract had retro or a signing bonus?
Reply
Old 04-13-2019 | 10:33 AM
  #103  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
That's because you and I have disagreements on some of what you consider problematic areas of the current contract with respect to reserve rules. I've responded with my point of view on those items. I'll accept the snarky label but will disagree once again with you on the inaccuracy of my rebuttals.

As for snarkiness, how do you classify your oft-used phrase 'marvin mainliner'?
There were more than just reserve rules.

Marvin is not my phrase, just one I learned about in 1999. If the shoe fits then I'll use it.
Reply
Old 04-13-2019 | 06:23 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Retro pay? Signing bonus? When's the last time any airline contract saw such things? When's the last time a UAL or CAL contract had retro or a signing bonus?

Delta's last contract had retro, as did Continental's Contract '97...the second to last one.
Reply
Old 04-14-2019 | 03:08 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
There were more than just reserve rules.
Then your memory on the discussion is better than mine.
Reply
Old 04-14-2019 | 03:11 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
Delta's last contract had retro, as did Continental's Contract '97...the second to last one.
You are correct on Delta. Looks like Jan-Nov 2016 for retro.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices