Search
Notices

PP%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2019, 07:16 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Default

Less people commute to IAH, DEN, ORD, and IAD than SFO/EWR/LAX so you have more “in base” pilots available to pick up trips on shorter notice that are not “commutable “. We even have pilots who reside in these hub cities but hold lines in the junior hubs on the Coasts that enjoy picking up “out of base”. I see it every day. Should we ask the NC to do away with this so the bases where more pilots live in can have more open time and PP opportunities for “in base” pilots?
IAHB756 is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 07:57 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
Well, there's also another reason for the company to take a bit of time negotiating. Let's say we got a TA in January and it had a pony for every pilot.

What are the odds that pilots would complain that the company is shortchanging us and we want a flying unicorn for every pilot? So the TA gets voted down.

Eventually we get a contract with a unicorn (that flies poorly) for every pilot. It would likely pass but there'd still be a bunch of pilots complaining about not getting supersonic unicorns that poop skittles.
The MEC won't let us vote on unicorns and ponies. It's OK to protect the pilots from themselves sometimes.
baseball is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 08:30 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

It's not about getting a contract that compares to Pan Am in 1960. It's about restoring what was stolen from both sets of pilots in bankruptcy. Much of what was stolen we should have back by now. The new pilots don't have any idea what we SHOULD have.

Record profits? I want my work rules back. I want more than a lousy 3.5/day for vacation and training....and so on.

I want....I want. That's right. It's all about me.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 01:09 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
Mako, please specifically name the bogus loopholes and concessionary gimmicks.
No thank you. Your previous posts snarky and inaccurate rejoinder persuaded me to skip taking the trouble.

There were numerous threads here and in particular, the union forum which spelled them all out. Guys a whole lot more erudite than me detailed the zits. But, it passed and it's now history. When was that, 7 years ago? And how far are we away from our next contract? And please, let's not forget what was going on at the time which encouraged a whole mess of the pilot group to push for a concessionary JCBA. "We'll get em next time!"

The FNG's might be interested in how we got here, even though many of the older guys are not.

Try a search.

Last edited by oldmako; 04-11-2019 at 01:45 AM.
oldmako is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 01:42 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by Zenofzin View Post
Lol you want a pension again go for it I’ll take my money in a Schwab account that I can invest track the value AND ACTUALLY RECIEVE when I retire. What pan am pilots were making in 1962 adjusted for inflation has no relevance to what a competitive wage is now, business models change, nor does what Smisek or anybody else did or was paid 10 years ago, again brother let it go and live now not in some bitter past, life is good try to enjoy it. We are doing fine, the next contract will be better.
Once again, you miss my point. Please show the class where in my post I proposed a pension? I said that our current contract trails behind what others have in spite of the fact that it does not include a pension. And that pension was a huge piece of the negotiating pie. Those were pilot dollars, pilot retirements. Gone.

Pilots voted in a concessionary contract in order to "save the company" and "save the pension". Mr. Tilton and his buddies promised that it was off limits and safe. They then stole it as they had intended all along. We then voted for a contract which continued to keep some of those concessions in place.

(Google "Frontline: Can you afford to retire?" and watch the episode-specific to us) https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/front.../synopsis.html

Now, if you were a young buck and had a few decades to make up for that, yes, a 401K is an excellent vehicle for playing catch up and saving for retirement. At least until Uncle Sam deems otherwise. But what if you were nearing retirement at the time and had worked here for 20 plus years? Well, you got the shaft.

Your inane yarn about me being miserable and enjoying life is just more tripe and is getting old. My life is a hoot.

Last edited by oldmako; 04-11-2019 at 02:03 AM.
oldmako is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 08:57 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Mako...check out the PP action on the Bus today. ETT alerts are going off left and right. No takers at 50 or 75% so now the trips are popping into OT at 100%. Some lucky guy just got a 2 day worth 10k.

Its gonna be a long summer...maybe I should of stayed a bunkie!
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 09:38 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
rightside02's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Airbus 320 Right Seat
Posts: 1,440
Default

What base is this your talking about ? Iah ?
rightside02 is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 09:46 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 662
Default

Out of curiosity, was the old Cal always like this on the ppu opportunities? I'm post merger, but have heard United has moved to a more Cal style staffing philosophy.
webecheck is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 11:32 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by rightside02 View Post
What base is this your talking about ? Iah ?
IAD......fill
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 04-13-2019, 06:29 AM
  #100  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default Why they will drag it out

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
Well, there's also another reason for the company to take a bit of time negotiating. Let's say we got a TA in January and it had a pony for every pilot.

What are the odds that pilots would complain that the company is shortchanging us......
There are other reasons why the company would drag it out, besides the obvious.

How many Captains will retire this year and next? Almost 800..

Doing anything for them, including a nice “retro pay” or signing bonus buys zero good will for mgt, cause they’re soon gone. Any “lost pension reparations” for those would have the same result....for goodwill for company and ALPA. Once a pilot is retired, he is functionally silent. Less money spent on a retiring pilot is spread out to younger ones, who will more likely carry some good will with them a while.

Also, there is a business cycle and we are near the top. All the boats are floating high. That’s not a good position to negotiate from for the company. Waiting another year to 18 months will likely put us out of the top of they cycle.

Don’t buy that dream home/ yacht.. whatever just yet.
BMEP100 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices