Originally Posted by
TrojanCMH
Close enough. Maybe just make a shorter 787 with less fuel capacity and call it a 767 replacement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think you are talking about something like the 787-3 (same size as a -8 but with less fuel, lower weight, shorter wings), which got shelved after a lack of interest. The 787 is a 9 abreast plane (except at JAL where it’s 8), the 767 is 7 abreast. Apples and oranges.