Originally Posted by
irrelevant
Obviously there are many factors to consider. That doesn't mean one shouldn't counter misinformation...intentional or not. If flow is the priority, PSA's is inferior to Piedmont for a new hire. That is simple math. Would you rather be on the bottom of a seniority list with 6% of those senior to you leaving via flow every year, or on the bottom of a seniority list with 50% more leaving via flow every year?
It's a data point to add to the decision process.
Also, at PSA rate he probably will never see even LCR in PHL in the first year and a half at least.
PHL won't grow at PSA and might even shrink....while probably will always be there for Piedmont.
Another point is that piedmont lines might be bad...but he will be stuck for a long time in reserve anyway, so no big changes here...moreover he will not be able to hold captain LCR or better in PHL for a long time