Originally Posted by
jamesholzhauer
No, I said CA vacancies, not CAs. There’s a difference. And there’s a difference in who would bid to fill those 220 CA vacancies vice who would fill 190 CA vacancies, which is the overall thesis to my position that 320 CA will stabilize more junior than it is now with more total CA vacancies that include a higher paying airplane (the 220) than 190 CA.
And with respect to the A220 vacancies, there will be a corresponding number of reduced captain positions on the E190. So no net gain.
But yes, I agree the A320 will ultimately go less senior than now (percentage wise) and the A220 will be more senior than the E190.