Originally Posted by copycopy

He may know a lot of history, but he has a habit of misrepresenting it. His biases are on full display to those who also know the history. The lack of accuracy is normally what gets him in hot water with some of the other knowledgeable members of the community. That’s not to say that everything he writes on here is without merit, but I urge you to take a lot of his historical rhetoric with a grain of salt.