Originally Posted by
m3113n1a1
You shouldn't just willingly violate our contract though. That sets a bad precedent.
Originally Posted by
hockeypilot44
I wouldn't refuse a first leg reroute. That's a jackpot reroute. It's against the contract. You'll essentially get triple pay.
It’s not against the contract, at not least in my experience. 23.M.7 is a company convenience clause that allows a scheduler to forego 23.N and O coverage sequences to maintain schedule integrity. Perfectly allowed but it costs them a buttload of money.
If this is triggered the rerouted pilot should get single pay/credit for original rotation and double pay/no credit for the rotation flown. On top, the pilot who lost a slip should get single pay for the rotation the rerouted pilot flew.
GP