Originally Posted by
GuardPolice
It’s not against the contract, at not least in my experience. 23.M.7 is a company convenience clause that allows a scheduler to forego 23.N and O coverage sequences to maintain schedule integrity. Perfectly allowed but it costs them a buttload of money.
If this is triggered the rerouted pilot should get single pay/credit for original rotation and double pay/no credit for the rotation flown. On top, the pilot who lost a slip should get single pay for the rotation the rerouted pilot flew.
GP
23.M.7 does not trump 23.L.2. The pay you are referring to is the company’s “punishment” for violating 23.L.2. 23.M.7 allows them to forego the coverage ladder for a legal reroute (also with pay implications).*
*not a lawyer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk