Originally Posted by
Omar 111
Vol.1 specifies the interior inspection is the FO’s checklist, which includes logbook signoff, verifying MDM limititations, ETOPS signoff, etc. While all crew members are required to review the logbook, the administrative duties associated with the logbook fall squarely on the FO. (At least on the 737).
So when the Captain is sitting alone at the big oak table with his little glass of water facing a multibillion dollar prosecution making their case to an administrative law judge who assumes guilt until proven innocent, will that be an adequate affirmative defense? Likely not.
If you want to make the case that both pilots should be responsibile then fine. So should the dispatcher. And MX. But no one is more legally responsibile than the Captain and that's never going to change. The mentality that its the other pilot's book so whatever it must be good simply cannot be codified into a company manual to that extent.