Originally Posted by
aldonite7667
Of course it does. I was more referring to His reference to scope. Do you remember the 5 documents? Is that the iron clad protection that would have held up in terms of scope? United has Terrible Scope protection, and right now, UAL is asking for scope relief in some areas. I'll take all the protections we can get.
My reference to SCOPE was that we had the protection and didn't need to vote for the TA in order to "hurry up and get it". But that's not how it was sold, nor was it how many of the guys I flew with interpreted it since I heard all the time, "It's not great, but I wanted some protection because we don't know how long this will last if we vote no on this TA."
Ignorance combined with scare tactics. Special, special group we have here at B6.