Thread: Merger question
View Single Post
Old 10-07-2019 | 10:53 AM
  #54  
jamesholzhauer
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
yea, we should have just taken no scope. we could have gotten like $5/hr more and profit sharing.
So we had a choice between scope or a higher rates? News to me. Sounds like you are creating a false narrative of a choice to justify your yes vote and rewrite the history of our TA. Company didn’t want outsourced RJs. Period. If they did they would have done it before we had a CBA. Therefore that piece of scope didn’t take much negotiating capital. But sure, keep pushing N8’s narrative that they would outsource all our RJs if we voted no. Or that we couldn’t achieve a better CBA unless we sold scope. That simply isn’t true.
Reply