Originally Posted by
Bluedriver
To your first question, I have said:
"As I said, no JB pilot has suggested that RJ scope wasn't expected/demanded, but it's not a good justification for expecting/justifying a crummy CBA."
To this: "Dude I don’t know what will happen in 27 years..." You said you had 27 years left and that this issue wouldn't be an issue. That's the whole reason I wrote that long post.
And you say, you're glad we have scope. I say, it's partial scope, hence the content of the long post.
And to go full circle in this argument I never justified the CBA based on scope. My original comment was about guys thinking it’s worthless....oh yay we got scope who cares....that stuff.