Here is some of the other testimony, and it's not made up either, I ask why he (Dr. Kolman) would he say this statement about the tail if you are going to keep the uploaded tail theory going? Izakplt? 185flier?
It just does not make sense that a plane with that many years of service and over 20 million TO's and LDGs to have an issue that has been seen on one plane that you are referring to from the testimony When the lawyer for the plaintiff that sued Cessna admitted that ice was on the plane. I'm asking Why and given the testimony below.
Thanks for your time
14 Q So your assumption that he wasn't at 90 knots at 90 knots because
15 he stalled, right?
16 A That is correct
17 Q And you disregard the tail stall?
18 A The tail did not stall
19 Q Right, Circular logic?
20 A No, not at all. I think I've proved conclusively, not by
21 circular logic, but by objective engineering flight
23 tests, that the tail can not stall. It is physically
24 impossible for it to stall in that flight condition.
Last edited by Amigo; 01-04-2008 at 11:03 AM.
Reason: added 185flier?