Thread: Contract talks
View Single Post
Old 12-01-2019 | 04:16 PM
  #112  
Grumble
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
You can’t take it back unless you give something in exchange. B scale? You willing to work for regional pay? B scale us where this all started. Pilots said no to B scale. Regionals were born. It’s not that simple but it’s pretty darn close. So what do you have left that you can sacrifice?
Car salesmen must love you.

When I bought my house I gave a price I was willing to pay, below market value, and required new floors because I knew what the house was work and the sellers needed to move it as they were moving for a new career. There was no quid pro quo.

I will not vote yes on a contract that gives an inch on scope, or trades one thing for another. The company wants to grow and move passengers, and when I’m sharing responsibility for millions in revenue a day, billions in liability, and hundreds of millions in assets, you better believe I want my expertise and experience paid for as well as recovering that which was stolen from our brethren.

Originally Posted by pangolin
Co: we can’t compete - AA and DL have more 76 seaters

Pilots: you already have relief. Bring on a new SNB and you can add them.

Co: too expensive. Give us a break.

Pilots: ok then you can have all you need. Bring them in house. There are pilots flying them now - hire them.

Co: but but but .....

At best this is an impasse. If it made sense for the co to do so they would have taken the easy road.
If the company wants DAL level 76 seaters, then they can park 400 of the 50 seaters and fly DAL level number of those. Look at the 2018 contract comparison, compare work rules and pay, and look at DALs total RJ fleet (and add up all the seats)... then see whose really behind. It ain’t mgmt.

Last edited by Grumble; 12-01-2019 at 04:28 PM.
Reply