View Single Post
Old 01-23-2020 | 08:09 AM
  #6  
TimetoClimb
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 572
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Another Max casualty, although it was challenging to make the business case all along. NMA will probably involve into SOMETHING. Eventually.

The XLR is flying ff the shelves like hotcakes, exceeding even airbuses' expectations. The United order was probably the nail in the NMA coffin.
The 321XLR is the same tech as the neo but with added tanks, deceased payload iirc. It's obvious that airlines want an airframe they can deploy on a wide vsriety (up to 4700NM) of routes with reasonable load factors and to be able to redeploy if a particular route isn't profitable. Long and thin. I think there is definitely a case for a 5000NM plane with 210-240 pax and 25 percent lower burn but who knows.

757MAX
Reply