Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Boeing NMA is DOA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2020, 04:33 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,094
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot View Post
decades of CRM data. Decades. One pilot is not the answer.

We obviously have no idea what happened with Kobe but I’d bet that having a second pilot (if there wasn’t one) probably would have done wonders for CRM in the challenging conditions if it wasn’t a mechanical issue.

One pilot aircraft operating as an airliner would throw out all we know about CRM. And quite frankly many of us and many more passengers would probably be dead today if it weren’t for operating in a crew environment and treating it as a crew mission.
I definitely agree with you in past times.

I don't really want to get into it too much because I have a separate thread for this stuff but what if something like this was installed (coincidentally installed on an S76):

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us...echnology.html

The pilot can concentrate on what's going around him/her and not flying the aircraft. Or the aircraft knows where it is and won't allow ground contact, it has geo fenced areas that will allow it to descend within XXX feet of the ground in those areas.

Interesting safety concept nonetheless.
Name User is offline  
Old 01-28-2020, 09:46 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
I definitely agree with you in past times.

I don't really want to get into it too much because I have a separate thread for this stuff but what if something like this was installed (coincidentally installed on an S76):

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us...echnology.html

The pilot can concentrate on what's going around him/her and not flying the aircraft. Or the aircraft knows where it is and won't allow ground contact, it has geo fenced areas that will allow it to descend within XXX feet of the ground in those areas.

Interesting safety concept nonetheless.
Or just another rated pilot to say “hey I don’t like this let’s cut bait and head back. It’s too risky.”

How many times would many of us have pushed it if it were not for the other guy sitting there saying something or just the fact that he’s even sitting there makes for more conservative and safe decision making.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 01-28-2020, 10:06 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
I definitely agree with you in past times.

I don't really want to get into it too much because I have a separate thread for this stuff but what if something like this was installed (coincidentally installed on an S76):

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us...echnology.html

The pilot can concentrate on what's going around him/her and not flying the aircraft. Or the aircraft knows where it is and won't allow ground contact, it has geo fenced areas that will allow it to descend within XXX feet of the ground in those areas.

Interesting safety concept nonetheless.
As long as the tech works, all is great. The max crisis really makes me question who steps up and takes responsibility for design failures after tragedy.
305808 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Major
97
03-21-2011 03:03 PM
b82rez
Major
728
03-31-2010 06:10 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
11
04-03-2008 09:35 AM
vagabond
Technical
3
09-06-2007 02:51 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices