Yes, and I stand by them. I see ZERO chance of the mandatory retirement age being changed to 63 considering the multitude of factors and bi-partisan interests that resulted in age 65.

In all seriousness, I’d love to hear your thesis why age 63 is plausible if you don’t agree.

Actually high. And by the end of January my portfolio reflected it. I’ve found that observing Warren Buffett’s actions are more valuable than listening to politician’s words. YMMV.