Originally Posted by
CaptCoolHand
JMO, They should have offered it to anyone with 10 or 12 years or more on property with an irrevocable letter of resignation to be paid out for 24 months at 50hrs.
I think they'd have a lot more offers to bounce out.
I think if they wanted more, they would have just dropped the age to 62/61/60 etc. Dropping the age down to 60 would yield about 200 people who are eligible. But, if they just offer a relative handful as part of 23.A...then they checked that box and can move on to the other items in 23.A. Or maybe they offer more later once there’s more clarity on the peak/recovery.