Originally Posted by
highfarfast
Well, THAT would be a new interpretation of the contract not consistent with years of precedence. Is this the new company line that our wondrous union is accepting?
Sorry, you're wrong. You think the reassignment rules in 11.E also apply to reserves?
They have been denying those hotels randomly before as well. There is no consistent past precedence, and no language to support it.
Good luck arguing that.