Originally Posted by JUNEBUG82

Does anyone have a reference to show where a temporary reduction in hours has been used in bankruptcy as a baseline to reduce the minimum hour guarantee even further? This argument has been used a lot. If true, it is a strong argument against reducing hours. However, it seems unlikely it is true since bankruptcy would more likely reduce the hourly rates, not the minimum hour guarantee. I don’t see how reducing the min guarantee accomplishes much for the bankruptcy court. I’m
calling BS on this theory. That being said, I learn something every day, so I’m open to being proven wrong. Sources anyone?