Originally Posted by
echelon
Someone else can do the real math but just for illustrative purposes... doesn't paying 1000 people 50hrs/month over a given time period very roughly equate to paying 666.66 (repeating of course) people the full 75? Hence ~333 people saved from furlough?
I think because the most junior people get furloughed first it would actually save more than 333 jobs since they are lower on the pay scale. So I would think yes.....1000 peeps on incentive lines saves more than 333 jobs logically speaking. But again who knows how many butts they need in seats given how dynamic the situation is.