Originally Posted by
highfarfast
This/\
Pilot furloughs are expensive, it's entirely possible they decide that pilot furloughs are worth it and it's better to be a little fat on pilots for a little while, particularly when looking at the retirements that are coming. And while I recognize that's the positive spin, it's still a realistic possibility. Nobody knows yet what the real answer is and I'm sure while the company is talking to the union about 'solutions' the company message is going to be that 'it's bad'.
Envoy being fat on pilots? I have never seen that. They’d rather burn the reserve pilots/JM etc. than being fat on pilots. We’re talking about a company who rather be retroactive than proactive.